Adverse Childhood Experiences questionnaire (ACE)
Score the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) questionnaire, a brief count of adversities before age 18 that is strongly linked to later health and mental-health outcomes. Ten items, shown in full, with an AI prompt to score de-identified responses.
De-identify first. The prompt runs in your own AI assistant. Never paste a client's name or identifying details into a general AI assistant.
What it measures
The ACE questionnaire comes from the CDC-Kaiser Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. It counts ten categories of adversity experienced before the age of 18, across abuse, neglect and household dysfunction. A higher ACE score is associated, at the population level, with greater risk of a range of physical and mental-health difficulties.
It is a history-taking and risk-stratification aid, not a diagnosis. A high score signals the value of a trauma-informed approach; a low score does not rule out significant adversity.
The ACE items
Before the age of 18, did the client experience each of the following?
- A parent or adult in the home often swore at, insulted, humiliated or put them down.
- A parent or adult often pushed, grabbed, slapped or hit them hard enough to leave marks.
- An adult or older person touched them sexually, or made them touch, in a sexual way.
- They often felt that no one in the family loved them or thought them important, or the family did not look out for each other.
- They often felt there was not enough to eat, had to wear dirty clothes, or had no one to protect them; or parents were too impaired to care for them.
- A parent was lost through separation, divorce or other reason.
- A parent or caregiver was often pushed, hit, or threatened with a weapon.
- Someone in the household had a problem with alcohol or other substances.
- A household member was depressed, had another mental illness, or attempted suicide.
- A household member went to prison.
Response options: No (0), Yes (1).
Scoring and interpretation
For each of the ten items, mark yes if the experience applied before the age of 18. Each yes scores one point, for a total from 0 to 10.
As a guide, a score of 4 or more is associated with markedly higher health risk at the population level. Interpret an individual's score in context, and be ready to offer support, since the questions touch on difficult experiences.
| Score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 0 | No reported ACEs |
| 1–3 | Moderate exposure |
| 4+ | High exposure — associated with greater health risk |
The questions touch on abuse, neglect and household adversity. Ask with care, ensure the client is supported, and never treat the number as a diagnosis.
Score it with AI
A ready-made prompt that turns any AI assistant into a scorer for the ACE. Paste it in, add the client's de-identified responses, and it computes the score and interpretation. Copy it, or download it to save as a reusable prompt.
- 1Copy the prompt below, or download it as a file.
- 2Open your AI assistant (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or any LLM).
- 3Paste the prompt, then add the client's de-identified responses.
- 4Review the score and interpretation before you use them.
You are a careful scoring assistant for the Adverse Childhood Experiences questionnaire (ACE), helping a qualified professional. You are a scoring aid, not a clinician: you do not diagnose or recommend treatment. Ground rules: - Use ONLY the items, response options and cut-offs given below as the source of truth. Do not rely on any version of this scale from memory; scales have variants and remembered items, scoring or cut-offs may be wrong. - If anything I paste could identify a client, stop and ask me to de-identify it before scoring. - Never guess, impute, average, or fill in a missing or unclear response. Scale: self-report measure, 10 items. Each item is scored: 0 = No; 1 = Yes. Items: 1. A parent or adult in the home often swore at, insulted, humiliated or put them down. 2. A parent or adult often pushed, grabbed, slapped or hit them hard enough to leave marks. 3. An adult or older person touched them sexually, or made them touch, in a sexual way. 4. They often felt that no one in the family loved them or thought them important, or the family did not look out for each other. 5. They often felt there was not enough to eat, had to wear dirty clothes, or had no one to protect them; or parents were too impaired to care for them. 6. A parent was lost through separation, divorce or other reason. 7. A parent or caregiver was often pushed, hit, or threatened with a weapon. 8. Someone in the household had a problem with alcohol or other substances. 9. A household member was depressed, had another mental illness, or attempted suicide. 10. A household member went to prison. Interpretation (ranges are inclusive; work out from these bands whether a higher score means more or less of the construct): - Total 0 to 10: 0 No reported ACEs; 1–3 Moderate exposure; 4+ High exposure — associated with greater health risk. When I give the client's de-identified responses, work in this order: 1. Parse them as item → value and restate the table so I can check it. If I give option labels, the client's words, or a finer scale than the options above, map each to the listed values and show the mapping. 2. Validate before scoring: confirm there are exactly 10 responses, each within its allowed range. If any are missing, extra, duplicated, out of range, or ambiguous, STOP and tell me what is wrong. Do not score a partial or invalid set. 3. Show your work: list the value used for each item (after any reverse-scoring), then add them explicitly. Add them to reach the total. Use only the numbers above. 4. Report, in this order: - the total score; - the severity band, quoting the exact range it falls in; - one or two sentences on what the score means on this scale; - this caveat: The questions touch on abuse, neglect and household adversity. Ask with care, ensure the client is supported, and never treat the number as a diagnosis. - a reminder that the ACE is a screening or rating aid, not a diagnosis, to be read within a full clinical assessment. 5. Re-check the arithmetic before finalising, and do not add a diagnosis, formulation or treatment plan unless I ask separately. Here are the de-identified responses:
Before you rely on the score
- Check the maths yourself. AI assistants can still add up wrong or misapply a rule. The prompt makes the assistant show each item's value and the sum, so glance over that working, and re-total anything you will act on.
- Confirm it used this scale. Check that the items, response values, reverse-scoring and cut-offs it used match this page, not a different or outdated version the model recalled.
- Watch for missing or odd inputs. The prompt is told to stop rather than guess a missing or out-of-range response. If it scores anyway, treat the result as unreliable and re-check your inputs.
- Act on critical items regardless of the total. Respond to risk indicators, such as a self-harm item, on their own merit, even when the overall score looks low.
- De-identify first, every time. The assistant runs in your own account, outside ElloMind. Never enter a client's name or identifying details.
- It is a screening aid, not the decision. The score supports your clinical judgement within a full assessment. It does not diagnose, and it does not decide.
Use the score in your notes
Take the score into a de-identified write-up with one of the free AI tools.
Citation and sources
Felitti, V.J., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults (the ACE Study). American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
The ACE questionnaire is freely available for clinical and research use.
- Adverse Childhood Experiences (overview) — Wikipedia
- About the CDC-Kaiser ACE Study — CDC
Frequently asked questions
Each of the ten items scores one point if the experience occurred before age 18. The points are summed for a total from 0 to 10.
At the population level, a score of 4 or more is associated with markedly higher risk of various health and mental-health problems. For an individual, it signals the value of a trauma-informed approach, not a diagnosis.
It can be, with care. The items touch on abuse and adversity, so ask sensitively, make sure the client is supported, and be ready to respond if distress arises.
No. The prompt runs in your own AI assistant, and ElloMind never sees it. De-identify client information first.
A screening and rating aid for qualified professionals, not a diagnosis or a substitute for clinical judgement. Interpret every score within a full assessment. Never paste identifiable client data into a general AI assistant. If a client is in crisis, contact a crisis helpline right away.